From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Rodney M. Bates" <rodney.bates@wichita.edu>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: breakpoint for accessing memory location
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ubqo5pc7y.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <453A6D1D.1080009@wichita.edu> (rodney.bates@wichita.edu)
> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:55:25 -0500
> From: "Rodney M. Bates" <rodney.bates@wichita.edu>
> CC: gdb@sourceware.org
>
> What if I put a watch on p->f where there is a visible p, then execution
> goes somewhere where p is not visible, but p still exists? For example,
> suppose p is local to function foo, and foo calls non-nested function bar.
This doesn't qualify as going out of scope, because p is still on the
stack. Only when the function where p is declared returns, will p go
out of scope and the watchpoint be deleted.
> Or, I haven't placed the watch yet and first stop execution in bar. Can
> I now place this watch after moving up the stack to foo's frame?
Yes, because p is in scope in any function called from foo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-21 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-19 20:10 Erik Leunissen
2006-10-19 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-19 20:24 ` Erik Leunissen
2006-10-19 20:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-19 20:28 ` Erik Leunissen
2006-10-20 6:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 14:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-21 13:20 ` [commit] Fix annotations-related index entries (was: breakpoint for accessing memory location) Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-20 16:56 ` breakpoint for accessing memory location Erik Leunissen
2006-10-20 17:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-21 12:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-21 22:28 ` Erik Leunissen
2006-10-22 4:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-22 9:11 ` Erik Leunissen
2006-10-22 9:19 ` Erik Leunissen
2006-10-22 22:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-23 7:41 ` Erik Leunissen
2006-10-21 15:06 ` Rodney M. Bates
2006-10-21 15:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-21 15:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-21 15:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-21 21:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-21 22:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-22 4:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-22 4:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-22 12:18 ` Robert Dewar
2006-10-22 22:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-22 22:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-22 22:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-22 22:49 ` Robert Dewar
2006-10-22 23:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-23 2:03 ` Robert Dewar
2006-10-23 4:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-23 12:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-22 22:48 ` Robert Dewar
2006-10-22 22:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-22 22:55 ` Robert Dewar
2006-10-23 4:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-22 20:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-10-21 18:07 ` Rodney M. Bates
2006-10-21 21:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-21 18:55 ` Rodney M. Bates
2006-10-21 21:53 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-10-22 15:20 ` Rodney M. Bates
2006-10-22 17:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-22 22:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-23 22:02 ` Jim Blandy
2006-10-24 4:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-24 12:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-10-24 17:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-10-24 17:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ubqo5pc7y.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=rodney.bates@wichita.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox