From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-28915-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26834 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 21:00:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 26826 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2007 21:00:30 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:00:28 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-162-148.inter.net.il [80.230.162.148]) 	by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id CXN67051 (AUTH halo1); 	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:12 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 21:00:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ubqf3oilf.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
CC: pkoning@equallogic.com, jimb@codesourcery.com, eager@eagercon.com,         stanshebs@earthlink.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <46802911.7070209@adacore.com> (message from Robert Dewar on Mon, 	25 Jun 2007 16:44:01 -0400)
Subject: Re: What's an annex? stratum?
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <467D5FEF.7010900@eagercon.com> <467D6D1F.7090507@earthlink.net> <467D6FB8.4080909@eagercon.com> <m3tzsvsyh0.fsf@codesourcery.com> <468009EA.4040504@eagercon.com> <m3sl8f6eab.fsf@codesourcery.com> <18048.5444.903092.843811@pkoning.equallogic.com> <20070625193135.GA6391@caradoc.them.org> <4680199F.7020906@adacore.com> <uk5trojxj.fsf@gnu.org> <46802911.7070209@adacore.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:44:01 -0400
> From: Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
> CC:  pkoning@equallogic.com,  jimb@codesourcery.com,  eager@eagercon.com, 
>  stanshebs@earthlink.net,  gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > In any case, if people here believe comments are a reasonable
> > substitute for documentation, perhaps I should from now on reject code
> > patches that do not explain themselves clearly, and do not contain
> > enough references to other related portions of GDB.
> 
> You should do that in *any* case, inadequately documented code
> is never acceptable.

You aren't familiar with my standards of ``adequate comments''.