Re: [RFC] Non-executable stack on SPARC

Eli Zaretskii
2004-02-01T20:13:36Z

> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 18:48:19 +0100 (CET)
> From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
>
> My line of thought is that it's IMHO fundamentally wrong to push
> target- or architecture-specific details into the application level of
> GDB, which is what infrun.c is. infrun.c should deal with high-level
> logic of handling a stopped inferior, it should not IMHO know about
> intricacies of specific targets.
>
> The question is to what extent this is an intricacy of a specific
> target.

I think that the set of signals, apart of SIGTRAP, that can express a
breakpoint on a given target/architecture is something infrun.c
shouldn't know about.