From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29285 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2006 04:29:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 29277 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2006 04:29:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:29:55 +0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HYN21696; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:29:51 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-165-88.inter.net.il [84.228.165.88]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CTO45447 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:29:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sourceware.org, jimb@red-bean.com In-reply-to: <20060222195032.GC30642@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:50:32 -0500) Subject: Re: Quoting, backslashes, CLI and MI Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060221213324.GA30729@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0602212223p1b8fda93meb9b12e5d187b3b6@mail.gmail.com> <20060222142953.GA20393@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0602220939i5189212ds8fb249747851cf72@mail.gmail.com> <20060222180137.GA27535@nevyn.them.org> <20060221213324.GA30729@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0602212223p1b8fda93meb9b12e5d187b3b6@mail.gmail.com> <20060222142953.GA20393@nevyn.them.org> <20060222195032.GC30642@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00314.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:50:32 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, jimb@red-bean.com > > Hi Eli, > > I think I haven't explained the issue with -exec-arguments very > clearly, since your two responses are contradictory. I agree > with one of them :-) Let me try to straighten it out. Thanks for the additional explanations, but I don't see where I said two contradictory things. Anyway, I agree with your examples and with their interpretation, so I think we agree in general here.