From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-24593-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10650 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2006 11:37:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 10633 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Mar 2006 11:37:23 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:22 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id IEF12298; 	Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:36:39 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-141-3.inter.net.il [84.228.141.3]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id CXK02544 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:36:36 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:40:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u8xr9pak1.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
CC: ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <17433.61359.500131.182453@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from 	Nick Roberts on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:07:27 +1300)
Subject: Re: MI: changing breakpoint location
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <dvc0k6$fgm$1@sea.gmane.org> <17433.61359.500131.182453@kahikatea.snap.net.nz>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2

> From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:07:27 +1300
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
>  > Now, I have to delete the old breakpoint and create the new one, which is
>  > workable, but not convenient.
> 
> I don't find a problem with that, but it would be nice if when a program is
> edited and recompiled that GDB could track the line number.  So, for example
> if the breakpoint is on line 10, say, and lines 4 and 5 are deleted, then
> after recompiling and restarting, its on line 8.

I agree.  When I saw the first message of this thread, I immediately
thought that this was the reason for Volodya to ask for that feature.

But even if Volodya did not think about this, I think such a feature
will be good to have.