From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17358 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2006 17:32:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 17349 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2006 17:32:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:32:14 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-149-41.inter.net.il [80.230.149.41]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id FZE93169 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:32:09 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: Nikolay.Molchanov@Sun.COM, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061011134916.GA25745@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:49:16 -0400) Subject: Re: Can I use -exec-interrupt to stop the inferior program? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <452C936F.2080704@sun.com> <20061011134916.GA25745@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00065.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:49:16 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > Eventually, you'll be able to do this properly in GDB. Nick has been > working hard on asynchronous operation, and once that's ready, we can > implement the -exec-interrupt operation using Windows API calls. Yes, I think the best idea is to have a Windows-specific implementation (alongside with a Posix one). Signals is one of the few areas where Windows is so different from Posix that no matter how hard you try to disguise it, that difference will eventually stick out.