From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19121 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2006 23:10:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 19105 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2006 23:10:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:10:19 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-192-58.inter.net.il [83.130.192.58]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FDM99077 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:10:14 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Nick Roberts CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <17748.62479.550269.959106@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:50:07 +1300) Subject: Re: -var-show-attributes response syntax Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200611101655.32843.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <17748.43269.740800.782628@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17748.62479.550269.959106@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 > From: Nick Roberts > Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:50:07 +1300 > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > > > > (Perhaps { a | b } should be documented in "Notation and Terminology".) > > > > It already is, AFAICS. > > What's to say {} aren't literal? (Which, of course, they are in the output > syntax.) Sorry, I no longer understand the problem you were talking about. AFAICS, the `{}' are literal (and so don't need to be discussed), while `|' is _not_ a literal character and is already documented in "Notation and Terminology". What am I missing?