From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28945 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2007 17:56:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 28933 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2007 17:56:16 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:56:10 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-13-121.inter.net.il [80.230.13.121]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id DOJ48215 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 20:56:04 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus CC: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200709071404.14065.ghost@cs.msu.su> (message from Vladimir Prus on Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:04:13 +0400) Subject: Re: MI: "^running" issues Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200709041653.22357.ghost@cs.msu.su> <18145.5117.427647.382269@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <200709071404.14065.ghost@cs.msu.su> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 14:04:13 +0400 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > gdb@sources.redhat.com > > That's pretty much what I was complaining recently -- without a design > doc for async mode it's not only impossible to understand the existing > code, but it's also impossible to understand the code that you're proposing. We don't require a design doc for any other change, and I don't see why the async mode should be any different.