From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Testsuite status/proper configure?
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 10:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <u8pubbia7i.fsf@gromit.moeb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200107081550.IAA30227@bosch.cygnus.com>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com> writes:
> Your test process looks okay to me.
>
> These are similar to my test results. I run the test suite each weekend
> week and post the results to:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-testers
Thanks. Now I have confidence to my results and will post them in the
proper way (with all needed info) next time. The number of FAILS
suprised me.
> Nitpick #1: dejagnu does not report the count of ERRORs and WARNINGs.
> I have to count these by hand:
>
> grep -c ERROR gdb.sum
> grep -c WARNING gdb.sum
> The triple "# ERRORs, # WARNINGs, # FAILs" is more useful than "# FAILs",
> because if something goes wrong, the results can have a lot of ERRORs
> and WARNINGs with fewer FAILs.
I'll add these next time.
> Nitpick #2: it helps to know which compiler you ran the test suite with.
> gdb should behave the same no matter what compiler that it's built
> with. But the debug info in the programs-under-test depends a lot on
> what compiler it's built with and the version of that compiler. In
> particular, there's a big difference between v2 gcc and v3 gcc.
> (I use a v3 gcc when I test).
I've used gcc 2.95.3.
> Basically your test process is good and those numbers are real.
Thanks for the confirmation,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-08 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-08 9:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2001-07-08 10:49 ` Andreas Jaeger [this message]
2001-07-12 12:50 ` Mark Kettenis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-08 7:48 Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=u8pubbia7i.fsf@gromit.moeb \
--to=aj@suse.de \
--cc=chastain@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox