From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28107 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2007 18:51:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 28073 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2007 18:51:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:51:55 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-212-123.inter.net.il [84.229.212.123]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id DHA60026 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 21:50:48 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:51:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: gdb@sourceware.org, dewar@adacore.com, b07584@freescale.com, rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org, jimb@codesourcery.com In-reply-to: (message from Ian Lance Taylor on 04 Aug 2007 11:32:44 -0700) Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4414a3a80707292340v1e8918edp204ea680f61823c2@mail.gmail.com> <20070731000833.GB1092@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <200708021302.37222.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <46B2101F.6060305@adacore.com> <20070802183431.GA6833@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070803231205.GB11438@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00033.txt.bz2 > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, dewar@adacore.com, b07584@freescale.com, rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org, jimb@codesourcery.com > From: Ian Lance Taylor > Date: 04 Aug 2007 11:32:44 -0700 > > As far as I can tell, you are requesting that we not do anything dumb, No, that's not it. My problem is that I don't see the motivation for rejecting such messages spelled out anywhere. The URL you mentioned _advises_ to do something, but, AFAIU, there's some policy issues involved here, which are not explained anywhere. > we're free software volunteers just like you. We're on your side. > We won't do anything dumb. Isn't this a matter of policy of Red Hat (or some other organization)? I do trust you, but I don't know about organizations.