From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8395 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2004 05:53:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8387 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2004 05:53:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2004 05:53:26 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ath6V-0002Vc-6C; Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:52:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 05:53:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) CC: cagney@gnu.org,gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040218214740.D8E584B367@berman.michael-chastain.com> (mec.gnu@mindspring.com) Subject: Re: Close all [most] SPARC PRs? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040218214740.D8E584B367@berman.michael-chastain.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:47:40 -0500 (EST) > From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) > > Attach that message in a change from "open" -> "feedback". > Wait 30 days. > > About 80% of cases, nothing happens for 30 days. Then close the PR, > with another little note: "I haven't heard anything for 30 days. > I am closing the PR. If you have problems with a more recent version > of gdb, please file another PR." > > About 15% of cases, the original submitter writes back sooner and > confirms that the original bug is closed. Then close the PR. > > About 5% of cases, the original submitter says something which indicates > that we shouldn't close the PR. > > Mark K already did a 30-day routine on a bunch of Solaris PR's, > and the 30 days ran out, and he closed the PR's. > > Anyways, that's how I like to do it. I really like this procedure. Blindly closing the PRs should not be our first choice if we can do better, and what Michael suggests _is_, IMHO, better.