From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30448 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2009 03:26:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 30419 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2009 03:26:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout3.012.net.il (HELO mtaout3.012.net.il) (84.95.2.7) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:26:15 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout3.012.net.il by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHG00K00EV4IJ00@i_mtaout3.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:26:13 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.171.54]) by i_mtaout3.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHG00CDGEVO45X1@i_mtaout3.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:26:13 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:26:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: gdb 7.0: 5 weeks to branch-time... In-reply-to: <20090401215827.GF8930@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <20090401215827.GF8930@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:58:27 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > Hello everyone, > > We're getting closer to our desired branch time, so I thought > a quick update on our situation would be nice. I'm looking at > our TODO list for this release > (http://www.sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.0_Release): > > * Assert in frame.c:get_frame_arch > I don't think anyone actually triggered that assert so far, so > we might not have to remove it from the branch. We can postpone > that decision for after we've created the branch. > > * Python: Pretty printing > Done? > > * Inlining support > Mark to provide some feedback about the proposed patch. > > * PR/9711: Quadratic slowdown for "where" command. > I don't think anyone worked on that one so far. Any volunteer? > > Optional items: > > * Python: Support for new parameters and/or convenience functions > (?) I forgot what this means :-( > > * Process record and replay: > Sounds like this is still underway > > * Multiprocess support: > Sounds like work is also underway. Status update on how far we are? > > Thanks, everyone. I can't wait to see 7.0 out :). I still have the issues with file names reported here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-03/msg00618.html I take it that the silence means everyone agrees with the renaming? If so, I will give it a go in a day or two.