From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23408 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2006 04:19:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 23396 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2006 04:19:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:19:14 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-251-210.inter.net.il [83.130.251.210]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FCV86315 (AUTH halo1); Wed, 8 Nov 2006 06:19:09 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:19:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061108015752.GA4565@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:57:52 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] MinGW and i386_pe_skip_trampoline_code Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <455125A3.30304@portugalmail.pt> <20061108015752.GA4565@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 20:57:52 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > The FSF tree doesn't even support native GDB on MinGW, to the best of > my knowledge. The MinGW people have local patches that I don't believe > have ever been submitted (this is hearsay, I've never looked myself). Yes, you are right. I'm not one of the ``MinGW people'' who maintain the native GDB, but I've seen the patches, and they aren't in the official sources, for reasons that evade me.