From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-31242-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3552 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2008 04:24:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 3188 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2008 04:24:27 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:24:01 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-167-98.inter.net.il [84.228.167.98]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) 	with ESMTP id JIW64284 (AUTH halo1); 	Sun, 2 Mar 2008 06:21:12 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 04:24:00 -0000
Message-Id: <u1w6tkb3p.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: nickrob@snap.net.nz, gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20080302035912.GA8955@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:59:12 -0500)
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] GDB 6.8 release process created!
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <announce.20080229183523.GC25865@adacore.com> <ud4qekc8t.fsf@gnu.org> <18377.54973.885633.998260@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080302035912.GA8955@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 22:59:12 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:20:45AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > That seems like a lot of failures.
> 
> Mid-seventies is about typical for my runs.  For instance most of the
> Ada tests blow up with current FSF gnat (Joel knows about this, the
> AdaCore sources work better).  GPC, if you have it installed, fails a
> bunch of Pascal tests.

I have neither Gnat nor GPC on that machine, and the respective
failures are not in the test logfiles.

> >         FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: continue to printf
> >         FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: send SIGUSR1
> >         FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: signal sent
> >         FAIL: gdb.cp/annota2.exp: continue to exit
> >         FAIL: gdb.cp/annota2.exp: watch triggered on a.x
> 
> I fixed these in HEAD right after I was informed of them.  I don't
> think either the patch causing them or fixing them has been moved to
> the branch.

I don't see these in the logs, FWIW.