From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-32008-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5057 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2008 06:30:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 5048 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jun 2008 06:30:28 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout1.012.net.il (HELO mtaout1.012.net.il) (84.95.2.1)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:30:09 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([80.230.28.131]) by i-mtaout1.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0K2200M4NYQ2LO70@i-mtaout1.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:44:27 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:30:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: How can I get a memory map out of a core file?
In-reply-to: <1212789259.3601.426.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
Cc: bruce.korb@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <u1w39oj06.fsf@gnu.org>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <668c430c0806061345m3c480d95nac5d19b02998715c@mail.gmail.com> <1212789259.3601.426.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2

> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:54:19 -0700
> 
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 13:45 -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > "jmap" looked really nice, but that is Solaris only.
> > "pmap" is almost what I want, but there's no /proc/pid directory
> > for my core dump any more.
> > If there is some GDB command I can use, I haven't found it.
> > I haven't seen any obvious way to emulate it either.
> > Surely someone, somewhere has solved this problem.
> > Anyone know where the solution is hiding?  :)
> > Thank you.  Regards - Bruce
> 
> Try "help info proc mappings".  It may be the closest we've got
> to what you want.

How can this help in a core file?  The process is already dead, so
it's not in /proc, right?  Or am I missing something?