From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 1652 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 21:21:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136)
  by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 21:21:54 -0000
Received: (from carlton@localhost)
	by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0ALLh224122;
	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:21:43 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f
To: gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: how canonical are template names?
References: <ro13co0em8e.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 21:21:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <ro13co0em8e.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <ro1wulcd7ko.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00173.txt.bz2

On 10 Jan 2003 13:19:45 -0800, David Carlton
<carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:

[ Whoops! ]

Sorry, if you just got a message titled "how canonical are template
names?", I accidentally sent that in the middle of composing it; the
real message will come in a bit.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu