From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32323 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2003 17:03:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32316 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2003 17:03:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 17 Feb 2003 17:03:07 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1HH35I16831; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:03:05 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb 5.3 versus gdb HEAD%200302015 References: <200302170332.h1H3WYo00673@duracef.shout.net> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200302170332.h1H3WYo00673@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00268.txt.bz2 On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 21:32:34 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain said: > . gdb.c++/virtfunc.exp: print pEe->D::vg() > XFAIL -> FAIL > XFAIL -> KFAIL > Needs investigation. > Probably gdb stayed the same and the test suite improved. I'm curious: what shows up in gdb.log when you get FAIL here? I just KFAILed the output I saw; I have no reason to believe that there aren't other valid outputs that would manifest the same bug, however. Certainly you should feel free to add more KFAIL branches to that test if you wish; just send them all to the same PR. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu