From: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>, gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: current namespace game plan
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ro1vg42b4t3.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15789.43864.432576.737958@localhost.redhat.com>
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:09:28 -0400, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
> Could you start writing some test files with these examples? Even if
> the tests are not passing, I find it is really useful while working on
> something, to monitor my own progress. You could put these tests on
> the branch(es), so that anybody can look at them. Or we could even add
> them to mainline with KFAILs.
Good idea. I've added some tests to namespace.exp in
carlton_dictionary-branch that demonstrate the cases that that branch
is currently handling more-or-less correctly. (Which, right now, is
anonymous namespaces and functions defined in a namespace, though
it doesn't handle either case _quite_ correctly yet.)
But I like your idea of adding a whole bunch of tests, even including
ones that I know won't be handled correctly, and marking them to fail.
I'll do that next.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-16 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-04 14:57 David Carlton
2002-10-04 15:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-04 15:58 ` David Carlton
2002-10-04 17:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-04 19:43 ` Jim Blandy
2002-10-07 11:50 ` David Carlton
2002-10-16 11:14 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-16 11:46 ` David Carlton [this message]
2002-10-21 12:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-23 16:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-23 16:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-23 18:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-23 21:02 ` Stan Shebs
2002-10-24 15:07 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 15:26 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ro1vg42b4t3.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU \
--to=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox