From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 442 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 18:59:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 434 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 18:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 18:59:45 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gB9IxcK18583; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 10:59:38 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Stan Shebs Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Namespaces with gcc v3 stabs+? References: <200212062105.gB6L5sH05223@duracef.shout.net> <3DF20A35.4090706@apple.com> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 10:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3DF20A35.4090706@apple.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 06:48:21 -0800, Stan Shebs said: > David Carlton wrote: >> It seems to me that, for now, it wouldn't be a great idea to >> convince GCC to generate a fancy version of stabs, then, until >> somebody appears who's particularly motivated to deal with the >> issues that arise. > Apple might need to do this. Great; hopefully I'll be able to setup a framework that will make it relatively easy for y'all, then. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu