From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10179 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2002 22:26:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10168 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2002 22:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 2002 22:26:26 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gA4MQHK26933; Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:26:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb Subject: Re: should minimal symbols be able to force lookup_symbol to return NULL? References: <15814.61993.475200.691004@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 14:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15814.61993.475200.691004@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00048.txt.bz2 On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 17:18:17 -0500, Elena Zannoni said: > David Carlton writes: >> I'll wait until my first stab at refactoring (which, I hope, preserves >> the current behavior exactly) (well, almost exactly: there's one or >> two changes which I think of as bugfixes, but it's quite careful about >> control flow) gets approved before I submit an RFA for that. >> Certainly I'm glad that Joel has appeared and is willing to run >> proposed changes through the testsuite on HP/UX machines. >> > I sent out a reply last night. > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00026.html Yes, I saw it, thanks! I just didn't have time to respond to it properly yet: my actual job has rudely intervened. (Plus, Michael Snyder was kind enough to invite me over to Red Hat today.) But I'm almost done entering in homework grades, so hopefully I'll be able to come up with a proper response later today; if not today, tomorrow. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu