From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31738 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2002 19:31:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31730 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2002 19:31:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Sep 2002 19:31:36 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8CJVaN05153; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 12:31:36 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: gdb Subject: list of GNU indent versions in gdb_indent.sh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 12:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 I noticed that gdb_indent.sh complained at me because I'm using GNU indent 2.2.7 instead of 2.2.6. I ignored the warning, but of course that's something I don't like to do. Does anybody have any reason to believe that GNU indent 2.2.7 or 2.2.8 isn't a reasonable version as well? If not, I'll look through the ChangeLogs/NEWS/whatever the appropriate file is for GNU indent for those versions and, assuming they don't do anything strange, modify gdb_indent.sh to treat them as "reasonable". David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu