From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22774 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2002 17:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22767 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 17:14:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 17:14:26 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8GHEPi30542; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:14:25 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Fernando Nasser , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb@sources.redhat.com, Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: Pinging Michael C References: <20020914045436.GA22119@nevyn.them.org> <3D85F0F3.5060108@redhat.com> <20020916150921.GA9184@nevyn.them.org> <20020916171150.GA23271@nevyn.them.org> From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020916171150.GA23271@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:11:50 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz said: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 10:03:16AM -0700, David Carlton wrote: >> So would it be okay if I changed the test with all the next's to >> construct all the objects before examining any of them, updated the >> comments on the one test to reflect the fact that the bug has been >> fixed, and then check them in? > Well, I think Fernando has approved the testsuite-side and I'm fine > with the C++ of the tests. I'd say yes. Great. I'll do that some time in the middle of the week then. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu