From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11603 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2003 16:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11592 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2003 16:21:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jackfruit.Stanford.EDU) (171.64.38.136) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 2003 16:21:42 -0000 Received: (from carlton@localhost) by jackfruit.Stanford.EDU (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h3GGLZ126328; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:21:35 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: jackfruit.Stanford.EDU: carlton set sender to carlton@math.stanford.edu using -f To: Elena Zannoni Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: testsuite errors on Red Hat 8.0 References: <20030416041146.GA2311@nevyn.them.org> <16029.26746.618459.649488@localhost.redhat.com> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <16029.26746.618459.649488@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:28:10 -0400, Elena Zannoni said: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:06:26PM -0700, David Carlton wrote: >> > I just updated GDB on my laptop for the first time in a while, and I'm >> > seeing some new testsuite errors: in gdb.base/completion.exp, I get: >> > >> > FAIL: gdb.base/completion.exp: (timeout) complete 'info func mar' >> >> I think Elena posted a patch for this one that hasn't been applied yet? > No I haven't. Can you try it and see if it fixes the fail? Yeah, it does. (Well, it does after I deleted the files 'completion.exp.patch' and 'completion.exp.orig' that I created in gdb.base; too bad completion.exp is so sensitive to these things!) Incidentally, should the test be renamed to completion 'info func marke' instead of completion 'info func mar' ? Or would that just annoy people doing regression testing? >> > FAIL: gdb.base/completion.exp: (timeout) complete 'set follow-fork-mode' >> >> Huh, not seen this one before. > wonder if this is just a cascade failure because of the timeouts. It was. David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu