From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13500 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2002 15:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13486 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2002 15:34:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO touchme.toronto.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2002 15:34:36 -0000 Received: from toenail.toronto.redhat.com (toenail.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.211]) by touchme.toronto.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B93AB8831; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fche@localhost) by toenail.toronto.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g8DFYZU18317; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:34:35 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: toenail.toronto.redhat.com: fche set sender to fche@redhat.com using -f To: Doug Evans Cc: Ben Elliston , binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: New binutils directory src/include/cpu/ for .cpu and .opc files? References: <3D813B07.4090401@ges.redhat.com> <15745.22648.285894.135472@casey.transmeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 08:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <15745.22648.285894.135472@casey.transmeta.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 dje wrote: > [...] > How about src/cgen-cpu (*)? Or maybe even src/cpu/cgen. If the idea of a new directory is just to separate (C)FSF from non-(C)FSF CGEN input model files, then such a big hierarchy change is not needed: e.g. src/cgen/fsf-cpu. - FChE