From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>,
Daniel Berlin <dan@dberlin.org>
Subject: Re: C++ nested classes, namespaces, structs, and compound statements
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 17:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <npwuvhraf1.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020406013408.A4570@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> How about -containing- `struct fields', instead of replacing? i.e. let
> the name search happen in the `struct environment', as before, but the
> data items would be fields (could be indicated in a flag in the
> environment, with a pointer to the type or symbol for the enclosing
> structure). I don't think turning members into symbols is a good idea.
I admit the idea of using `struct symbol' for fields as well as
variables is pretty weird. Here's the rationale:
First, keep in mind that `struct symbol' is sort of a `messy union':
it's used for a lot of distinct purposes, and it contains all the
members any of those purposes might need. The `struct symbol'
representing a declaration like `struct A' doesn't need its
ginfo.value field. The `struct symbol' representing a local variable
doesn't need its `bfd_section' field. (I'm not saying this is a great
way to do things; but it is the way it's done now.)
Now, when we're debugging a C++ program, if we have a class A, think
about what sorts of objects A::x could represent:
- It could be a member.
- It could be a static member, which is really a global variable
with a qualified name.
- It could be a typedef.
- It could be a nested class.
When the user says `ptype A::x', we should be able to just look up A,
then look up x in A's environment, and see what it is.
It needs to have an `enum address_class' to distinguish members from
typedefs.
If it's a static member, it'll need to have a bfd_section.
`struct field' is slowly acquiring the equivalent of `enum
address_class', but badly: here's the comment for the `bitsize'
member:
/* Size of this field, in bits, or zero if not packed.
For an unpacked field, the field's type's length
says how many bytes the field occupies.
A value of -1 or -2 indicates a static field; -1 means the location
is specified by the label loc.physname; -2 means that loc.physaddr
specifies the actual address. */
int bitsize;
How would you suggest we represent nested typedefs and classes?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-09 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-05 20:42 Jim Blandy
2002-04-05 22:05 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-05 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05 23:49 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-06 7:18 ` Dan Kegel
2002-04-06 9:26 ` Gianni Mariani
2002-04-06 11:57 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-08 17:24 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-08 17:03 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-08 18:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-09 18:35 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-09 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-12 15:08 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-12 16:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-08 17:19 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-04-08 18:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-10 10:31 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-10 12:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-12 13:58 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-12 16:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-16 12:08 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-16 14:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-16 14:52 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-16 14:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-06 6:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-06 7:58 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-08 0:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2002-04-08 2:01 ` Doubt in GDB SathisKanna k
2002-04-06 8:49 ` C++ nested classes, namespaces, structs, and compound statements Per Bothner
2002-04-08 16:29 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-08 16:48 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-09 6:55 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-04-10 10:34 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-10 12:31 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-10 12:53 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-04-05 22:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 22:13 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-05 22:30 ` Daniel Berlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=npwuvhraf1.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=bkoz@redhat.com \
--cc=dan@dberlin.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox