Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Berlin <dan@dberlin.org>
Subject: Re: C++ nested classes, namespaces, structs, and compound statements
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 17:19:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <npwuvhraf1.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020406013408.A4570@nevyn.them.org>


Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> How about -containing- `struct fields', instead of replacing?  i.e. let
> the name search happen in the `struct environment', as before, but the
> data items would be fields (could be indicated in a flag in the
> environment, with a pointer to the type or symbol for the enclosing
> structure).  I don't think turning members into symbols is a good idea.

I admit the idea of using `struct symbol' for fields as well as
variables is pretty weird.  Here's the rationale:

First, keep in mind that `struct symbol' is sort of a `messy union':
it's used for a lot of distinct purposes, and it contains all the
members any of those purposes might need.  The `struct symbol'
representing a declaration like `struct A' doesn't need its
ginfo.value field.  The `struct symbol' representing a local variable
doesn't need its `bfd_section' field.  (I'm not saying this is a great
way to do things; but it is the way it's done now.)

Now, when we're debugging a C++ program, if we have a class A, think
about what sorts of objects A::x could represent:

- It could be a member.
- It could be a static member, which is really a global variable
  with a qualified name.
- It could be a typedef.
- It could be a nested class.

When the user says `ptype A::x', we should be able to just look up A,
then look up x in A's environment, and see what it is.

It needs to have an `enum address_class' to distinguish members from
typedefs.

If it's a static member, it'll need to have a bfd_section.

`struct field' is slowly acquiring the equivalent of `enum
address_class', but badly: here's the comment for the `bitsize'
member:

    /* Size of this field, in bits, or zero if not packed.
       For an unpacked field, the field's type's length
       says how many bytes the field occupies.
       A value of -1 or -2 indicates a static field;  -1 means the location
       is specified by the label loc.physname;  -2 means that loc.physaddr
       specifies the actual address. */

    int bitsize;

How would you suggest we represent nested typedefs and classes?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-09  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-05 20:42 Jim Blandy
2002-04-05 22:05 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-05 22:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-05 23:49   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-06  7:18     ` Dan Kegel
2002-04-06  9:26     ` Gianni Mariani
2002-04-06 11:57       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-08 17:24       ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-08 17:03   ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-08 18:59     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-09 18:35       ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-09 20:56         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-12 15:08           ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-12 16:32             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-08 17:19   ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-04-08 18:49     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-10 10:31       ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-10 12:08         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-12 13:58           ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-12 16:56             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-16 12:08               ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-16 14:01                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-16 14:52               ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-16 14:58                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-06  6:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-06  7:58   ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-08  0:59   ` Joel Brobecker
2002-04-08  2:01     ` Doubt in GDB SathisKanna k
2002-04-06  8:49 ` C++ nested classes, namespaces, structs, and compound statements Per Bothner
2002-04-08 16:29 ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-08 16:48   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-09  6:55   ` Petr Sorfa
2002-04-10 10:34     ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-10 12:31       ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-10 12:53         ` Petr Sorfa
2002-04-05 22:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-04-05 22:13 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-04-05 22:30   ` Daniel Berlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=npwuvhraf1.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=bkoz@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan@dberlin.org \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox