From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30259 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2001 03:02:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30220 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2001 03:02:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2001 03:02:10 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id BCB2C5E9D8; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:03:27 -0500 (EST) To: Kevin Buettner Cc: Andrew Cagney , Jim Blandy , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: linux-thread.o no longer used References: <20011208193605.9BEB55E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <1011209214213.ZM18965@ocotillo.lan> <3C13E5CA.1080700@cygnus.com> <1011210011053.ZM19230@ocotillo.lan> From: Jim Blandy Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 19:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Kevin Buettner's message of Sun, 9 Dec 2001 18:10:53 -0700 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 Okay. A patch to delete those files is going to look stupid, and it won't really work (patch just truncates them to zero length, rather than deleting them). So may I just `cvs rm' the files, commit the change, and post a verbal 'PATCH' message to gdb-patches? Kevin Buettner writes: > > On Dec 9, 2:29pm, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Here I think the code should just go. We'll (well I'll) otherwize make > > the same mestake again of not realizing that something is using legacy code. > > > > This is different to the target case. In the above, functionality was > > replaced. With deleted targets, we're trying to remove targets. > > That's fine. I don't have strong feelings about it since I can > make local copies of the files that I want to refer to. Plus, they > are still in the repository (albeit, in the Attic) which means that > we can still get at them if we want to. > > Kevin >