From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26925 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2002 19:22:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26852 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2002 19:22:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jun 2002 19:22:57 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 493D85EA11; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:22:56 -0500 (EST) To: Daniel Berlin Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Live Range Splitting goodbye? References: From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00271.txt.bz2 Daniel Berlin writes: > On 21 Jun 2002, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Would anyone mind if I deleted the support for live range splitting? > > That would remove the following fields from struct symbol, get rid of > > a weird call to read_pc in symtab.c (!!), and a bunch of other stuff. > > I asked a few months ago, and no one ever answered when I asked. Well, you know SMTP, right? Why not have, say, Andrew Cagney ask the question? Or Bill Gates? :)