From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22000 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2008 00:35:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 21949 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2008 00:35:02 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:34:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m390YgH9003928; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:34:42 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m390YgYV027876; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:34:42 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-248-97.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.97]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m390YfE7006337; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:34:41 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9C0123780DB; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:34:39 -0600 (MDT) To: Michael Snyder Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Eli Zaretskii , Andreas Schwab , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Strangeness in set command References: <20080405185423.GB13805@caradoc.them.org> <1207595159.31772.330.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1207595159.31772.330.camel@localhost.localdomain> (Michael Snyder's message of "Mon\, 07 Apr 2008 12\:05\:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder writes: Michael> The shortcut is probably one of those "seemed like a Michael> good idea at the time" things, but now it's established Michael> and we're stuck with it. It seems to me that changing "set x = expr" from valid to invalid would be painful -- but it would be a one-time pain, and it would not cause surprises. Tom