From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23332 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2009 18:52:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 23314 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jul 2009 18:52:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:51:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6AIptUa028051 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:51:55 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6AIptAA028772 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:51:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6AIpswn012426; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:51:54 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4BACD888141; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 12:51:54 -0600 (MDT) To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Robustifying pretty-printers References: <200906131411.34204.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200907102040.34371.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200907102246.16291.vladimir@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200907102246.16291.vladimir@codesourcery.com> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Fri\, 10 Jul 2009 22\:46\:15 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Vladimir" == Vladimir Prus writes: Vladimir> 2. Varobj remembers the number of children to fetch. Vladimir> 1 is cumbersome. 2 requires that varobj remember the upper Vladimir> limit only. That's why I am suggesting -var-set-child-limit Vladimir> with a single parameter. If I'm not making myself clear Vladimir> yet, maybe we should talk on IRC, say on Monday? Yes, let's do that. I still don't understand. Tom