From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29644 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2011 13:58:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 29627 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2011 13:58:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:57:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2UDvsBS006226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:57:54 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2UDvrRm008878; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:57:53 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2UDvqQl023508; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 09:57:53 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 963B2378BE8; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:57:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Cc: Subject: Re: How to switch threads in gdb while a thread is being blocked References: <02ff01cbee6d$e9116b70$bb344250$@highwayman.com> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <02ff01cbee6d$e9116b70$bb344250$@highwayman.com> (chris hall list's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2011 01:03:28 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Chris" == writes: Chris> Though my experience with non-stop is that it crashes and burns when Chris> you single step through the end of some functions :-( If you haven't filed bug reports about this, please do so. If you have filed bug reports, could you mention the PR numbers here? I am curious. thanks, Tom