From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14033 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2011 14:29:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 14023 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2011 14:29:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:29:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3DETjQU024056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:29:45 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3DETjpI027502; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:29:45 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3DETi14019064; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:29:45 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8896A508611; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:29:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Kevin Pouget Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Follow-fork-mode and inferiors References: Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Pouget's message of "Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:33:01 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Pouget writes: Kevin> why are there two inferiors? I expected either to stay in inf 1 Kevin> (if the pid of an inferior can change) or inf 1 to disappear, but Kevin> not to keep both of them! I suspect that it may be due to your `follow-exec-mode' setting. I am not really certain though. Tom