From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25653 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2011 18:56:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 25635 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2011 18:56:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:56:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p95IuHjK012805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:56:17 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p95IuHAj022943; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:56:17 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p95IuFpO016112; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:56:16 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joost van der Sluis Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Handling of c++ function members References: <1317055596.23338.12.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <1317070857.17681.11.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <1317135598.27942.29.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> <1317563447.11265.19.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1317563447.11265.19.camel@feddie.cnoc.lan> (Joost van der Sluis's message of "Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:50:47 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joost" == Joost van der Sluis writes: Joost> Really, gdb contains a pile of hacks to get it working with gcc. That's Joost> not a problem but sometimes difficult when other compilers try to work Joost> with the official Dwarf-specifications. In recent years we've been trying to update GCC to conform better, and also to update GDB. We'd appreciate more help along these lines :-) Or even just bug reports about what is still wrong. Tom