From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28038 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2008 17:18:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 28021 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2008 17:18:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:18:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6UHE4IP029204; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:14:04 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6UHDw25032669; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:14:03 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-47.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.47]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6UHDvQh006558; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:13:58 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 21F8A888031; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:13:57 -0600 (MDT) To: Stan Shebs Cc: Marc Khouzam , jeremy.bennett@embecosm.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Multiprogram teaser References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA04291275@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <488F24C7.1000007@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <488F24C7.1000007@codesourcery.com> (Stan Shebs's message of "Tue\, 29 Jul 2008 07\:10\:15 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs writes: Stan> The list may get long - imagine Tom's example of GCC testsuite Stan> running under a multiprocess GDB that catches every cc1, gas, Stan> ld, etc run - that's dozens of programs and thousands of Stan> processes! I just want to be clear -- I read this example on the frysk web site. I'm not sure who came up with it, but I assume Andrew Cagney. Anyway, it is very compelling for the gcc hacker in me, so I use it as an example all the time :-) Tom