From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1904 invoked by alias); 8 May 2009 18:28:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 1893 invoked by uid 22791); 8 May 2009 18:28:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 May 2009 18:28:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n48ISCCK018228; Fri, 8 May 2009 14:28:12 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n48ISAxC013497; Fri, 8 May 2009 14:28:11 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-217.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.217]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n48IS9vx000603; Fri, 8 May 2009 14:28:10 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C13BE378149; Fri, 8 May 2009 12:28:08 -0600 (MDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: update on the gdb-7.0 branch/release References: <20090505173540.GB894@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090505173540.GB894@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue\, 5 May 2009 10\:35\:40 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> (2) Python pretty-printing: 1 issue left: Printing strings with Joel> NUL characters in them. Joel> Is that blocking? Or can we fix quickly? The pretty-printing patch series is still waiting for a review from an MI maintainer. In particular I wanted to make sure the new MI commands are ok. If any changes are needed I cannot do them for some time. I'm on paternity leave for at least one more week, maybe more. Phil is still working on the final part of the embedded \0 fix. I don't know how far out this is. IMO it is not a blocking issue, just nice to have; the feature is still very useful even with this bug. Joel> (7) Inlining support: Joel> Has Mark removed his objection based on Daniel's answers to Joel> his latest remarks? I did not see any response. Joel> Given all that, I'm not sure it's wise to try to push for a release Joel> before the summit. Sounds good. Tom