From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6896 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2009 17:05:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 6774 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2009 17:05:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:05:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TH5T5g015515; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:05:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5TH5S9v011862; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:05:28 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-41.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.41]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TH5RCO010502; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:05:28 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2F8BA3784C5; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:05:27 -0600 (MDT) To: Ralf Wildenhues Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src References: <20090628072452.GC16677__5485.08746219358$1246173962$gmane$org@gmx.de> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090628072452.GC16677__5485.08746219358$1246173962$gmane$org@gmx.de> (Ralf Wildenhues's message of "Sun\, 28 Jun 2009 09\:24\:54 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes: Ralf> I'd be grateful about feedback as to whether the general plan is Ralf> acceptable for everyone; thanks. Sounds good to me. Please don't forget Classpath. Ralf> I'd prefer to do the transition on the GCC trunk rather than in a Ralf> branch, unless there is opposition to this. Keeping a branch in sync Ralf> with the src tree seems awkward. BTW, should I keep any other trees in Ralf> sync with these two (archer, out-of-tree libffi)? You don't need to bother about the archer repository. We'll handle it via merges. Tom