From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31808 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2010 16:24:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31792 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2010 16:24:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:24:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o87GO4Hx005959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:24:04 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o87GO4ew017045; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:24:04 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o87GO3h4000871; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:24:03 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E917A3792BD; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:24:02 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Srinath Avadhanula , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Massive slowdown printing values in gdb-7.1 References: <20100906233108.GB21706@adacore.com> <20100907013559.GF21706@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100907013559.GF21706@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 6 Sep 2010 18:35:59 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> That did it! :) The latest from CVS: GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2.50.20100906 >> doesn't have this problem anymore. Joel> Wonderful news. If it's not asking too much, it would be interesting Joel> to determine whether 7.2 still shows the issue or not... This is probably the namespace-related performance bug. It was fixed in CVS a while ago. I can dig up the PR if you need it. Tom