From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19245 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2009 18:23:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 19200 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2009 18:23:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:23:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TINXxa003093; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:23:33 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5TINW96002478; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:23:32 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-41.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.41]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TINVmg025422; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:23:31 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 034503784C5; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:23:30 -0600 (MDT) To: Ralf Wildenhues Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Updating Autoconf and Automake versions used in GCC and src References: <20090628072452.GC16677__5485.08746219358$1246173962$gmane$org@gmx.de> <20090629180343.GB13030@gmx.de> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090629180343.GB13030@gmx.de> (Ralf Wildenhues's message of "Mon\, 29 Jun 2009 20\:03\:43 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00309.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes: Ralf> I'd be grateful about feedback as to whether the general plan is Ralf> acceptable for everyone; thanks. Tom> Sounds good to me. Please don't forget Classpath. Ralf> If you are talking about gcc/libjava/classpath, then yes, I have that on Ralf> my radar; or should I consider out-of-tree Classpath, too? If Classpath requires changes to the auto* input files, then yes, the changes have to go upstream. I can handle that, just CC me on the needed patch. Note that Classpath doesn't check in the generated files. So if not input file changes were needed, then there's nothing to bother about. Tom