From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27815 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2011 11:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27806 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2011 11:50:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from seketeli.net (HELO ms.seketeli.net) (91.121.166.71) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:50:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (torimasen.com [82.237.12.13]) by ms.seketeli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05E9EA046; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:53:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 500) id 238EC2A0298; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:50:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Dodji Seketeli To: BarrRobot , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: MI Interface - interpretation of value returned by -stack-list-locals (C++) References: <31246347.post@talk.nabble.com> <31268868.post@talk.nabble.com> X-URL: http://www.seketeli.net/~dodji Mail-Followup-To: BarrRobot , gdb@sourceware.org Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 11:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2011 07:50:41 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Hello BarrRobot, Tom Tromey a =C3=A9crit: >>>>>> ">" =3D=3D BarrRobot writes: > >>> Thanks. It would have been nice to avoid the round trip of another call= (or >>> many) to do all the necessary varobjs, so it looks as if I shall chicke= n out >>> and present it 'as is' for expediency at this stage. >>> One for the wish-list maybe? > > Please file a feature request in bugzilla. > The more detailed you can be, the better. Just out of curiosity, Have you filled an enhancement request for this yet? [A quick search in bugzilla hasn't yield anything for me]. I have also taken the route of creating one varobj per local variable in my MI client. It works great, but at this point I feel like any round trip that could be saved can actually make a user visible difference :-) So if you haven't filed anything yet, I'll file one. Thanks. --=20 Dodji