From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23348 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 23338 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:24:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6BHOg9J002327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:24:42 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6BHOgFT004030; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:24:42 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6BHOeTv030205; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:24:41 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Mike Frysinger , gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sim: using automake References: <201107080344.p683iRUq024788@ignucius.se.axis.com> <201107080020.19357.vapier@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:38:13 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> [I would prefer to avoid automake.] Can you say why? Doug> Question: can automake handle dependencies on machine generated files? Doug> I think(!) the answer is "no", so automake doesn't solve all problems. Yes. Doug> Observation: gdb no longer manually describes dependencies (*1) yet it Doug> doesn't use automake. Yes, I did this by porting the code from automake, since that seemed simpler than moving gdb to use automake. Using automake would actually offer other benefits, I just didn't want do deal with the details of the transition. Tom