From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10430 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2007 18:36:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 10322 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2007 18:36:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.33.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:35:59 +0000 Received: from zps76.corp.google.com (zps76.corp.google.com [172.25.146.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id l74IXWKQ006662; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 19:33:32 +0100 Received: from smtp.corp.google.com (spacemonkey1.corp.google.com [192.168.120.115]) by zps76.corp.google.com with ESMTP id l74IXQs0025483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:33:26 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain.google.com (adsl-71-133-8-30.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [71.133.8.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.corp.google.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l74IXO21004458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:33:25 -0700 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, dewar@adacore.com, b07584@freescale.com, rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org, jimb@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: Posting from work/university addresses References: <4414a3a80707292340v1e8918edp204ea680f61823c2@mail.gmail.com> <20070731000833.GB1092@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <200708021302.37222.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <46B2101F.6060305@adacore.com> <20070802183431.GA6833@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20070803231205.GB11438@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 18:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: > Since the regexps mentioned above were not disclosed, and the URL Ian > mentioned doesn't say anything about rejecting messages, and doesn't > define precisely which kinds of text will be a reason for rejection, I > can only hope that the filters will reject only messages that could > present legal problems for sourceware, not, for example, the kind of > text mentioned here: As far as I can tell, you are requesting that we not do anything dumb, such as, for example, blocking messages which are not spam and which do not violate the documented mailing list guidelines. That is a reasonable request. I promise we won't do anything dumb. I know you are just trying to be really precise about what is happening, but, honestly, don't worry: we're free software volunteers just like you. We're on your side. We won't do anything dumb. Ian