From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19971 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2008 00:08:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 19961 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jun 2008 00:08:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:08:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5Q08IMT001475 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:08:18 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5Q08I7j010146; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:08:18 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-10-97.bos.redhat.com [10.16.10.97]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m5Q08HYi029151; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:08:17 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0A2BE378297; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:08:17 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Automatic dependency tracking References: <200806152203.14626.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20080616012617.GA8944@caradoc.them.org> <20080625182858.GA25575@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080625182858.GA25575@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Wed\, 25 Jun 2008 14\:28\:58 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00265.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> Option two: we could require GNU make. FWIW it is pretty easy to implement automake-style dependency tracking with GNU make. This failed for GCC, due to make bugs, but GCC's Makefiles are weird. GNU make is really much nicer than the other alternatives. Daniel> Option four: We could borrow logic from BFD to generate dependency Daniel> lists. What's going on with this code anyway? Why does BFD need Daniel> dependency lists in Makefile.am if it uses automake? The BFD code predates Automake and, as I recall, was deemed to work well enough. Tom