From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9440 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2009 17:37:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 9432 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2009 17:37:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:37:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n75Hbbvm029205 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:37:37 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n75HbbF1027832 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:37:37 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n75Hbaif009341; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:37:36 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4246537857C; Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:37:36 -0600 (MDT) To: Grant Edwards Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Error in gdb make References: <27150072.194981249490623195.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <17863887.195221249491042898.JavaMail.root@zimbra> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Grant Edwards's message of "Wed\, 5 Aug 2009 17\:18\:37 +0000 \(UTC\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Grant" == Grant Edwards writes: Grant> On 2009-08-05, Praveen S. Solanki wrote: >> It seems that the newer libc don't consider it appropriate if >> the return values of libc function is not used. This causes >> make to fail. Grant> How libc can enforce such a "consideration" on usage of return Grant> values? GCC has a `warn_unused_result' attribute. Tom