From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10532 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 15:02:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 10517 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2011 15:02:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:02:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFF2Q7j014956 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:02:26 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFF2Pd1014158; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:02:26 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAFF2Onu015654; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:02:24 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Larroy Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: GIT and CVS References: Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Pedro Larroy's message of "Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:50:11 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00096.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Larroy writes: Pedro> Why not mercurial? it's more user friendly than git, and better cross Pedro> platform support. To answer your question, most active gdb developers are already using git and just use CVS for the final commit. But let's end this thread. We've had this discussion several times now and haven't learned anything new since (see point 6): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-03/msg00486.html The problem has been the lack of manpower, and perhaps willpower, to do the actual work. Tom