From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16426 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2010 17:54:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 16411 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Mar 2010 17:54:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:54:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2JHsCK7011624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:54:12 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2JHsBT6024319; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:54:12 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2JHsABQ024922; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:54:11 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 77739379848; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:54:10 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Michael Snyder , "gdb\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: same-name vars from different scopes References: <4BA2B416.6000708@vmware.com> <20100319052814.GG2858@adacore.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100319052814.GG2858@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:28:14 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> There's no syntax for printing a local variable which is hidden by a >> more inner definition. Joel> In that case, I think you have to switch frames (there might be Joel> a known bug with Ada on that subject). Actually, I meant nested lexical scopes: void f () { int x = something; { int x = something_else; } } If you in the inner scope, you can't refer directly to the outer 'x'. You can see it with "info locals", but you can't use it in an expression. Tom