From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8501 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2011 21:52:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 8486 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2011 21:52:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:51:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB1LppFq015852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:51:51 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB1LppkT018567; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:51:51 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB1LpoOU032133; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:51:50 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: GDB Development Subject: Re: ambiguous linespec decision point References: Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 21:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:09:52 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00003.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I think the absence of any reply, after a day or two, I will check it Tom> all in. Just FYI, based on current replies, I plan to check this in on Monday. Tom