From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10668 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2003 22:23:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10661 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 22:23:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 22:23:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 25481 invoked by uid 10); 2 Dec 2003 22:23:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 29316 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2003 22:23:16 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, wcohen@redhat.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names References: <20031202220907.683774B362@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:23:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20031202220907.683774B362@berman.michael-chastain.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes: > So, the new demangler is printing different, much smaller output. That's odd. I could understand it if gdb were passing DMGL_VERBOSE to cplus_demangle(). But as far as I know it is not doing so in any version. Could you extract a few of the larger demangled names from each version, and post them? It might be a good double-check that something isn't weirdly broken. It would be nice to have the mangled symbol name too, but not critical. Thanks. Ian