From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29013 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2009 23:41:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 29005 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2009 23:41:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:41:26 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n24NenMc013049; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:40:49 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n24Nemb9026740; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:40:48 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-255.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.255]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n24Nelew024148; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:40:47 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C44D83780E5; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:40:45 -0700 (MST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Doug Evans , teawater@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution References: <20090303170422.GA15154@caradoc.them.org> <20090304192647.GA21091@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090304192647.GA21091@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Wed\, 4 Mar 2009 14\:26\:47 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> Right, I thought about something that begins with "disassemble", but >> didn't want to shoot our completion habits in the foot, since >> currently typing just "disas TAB" is all I need to get disassembly. Daniel> I agree we don't want to change that binding (I use it all the time). Daniel> But is it a problem? This would be under set, if I understand right. Yeah, this sounds reasonable to me. I'd prefer to have some word like "disassemble" in the parameter name. Tom