From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23543 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2009 18:25:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 23435 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2009 18:25:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:25:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TIP6GA003662; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:25:06 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5TIP5jM003432; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:25:05 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-225-41.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.225.41]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5TIP42a025702; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:25:04 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E4E2E3784C5; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:25:03 -0600 (MDT) To: Niko Sams Cc: gdb Subject: Re: Execute code in python pretty printers References: <629542d40906281214x73c3b505nfeb7e7eecfb1f708@mail.gmail.com> <629542d40906291018i1e76383bn689dc351fdf018d@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <629542d40906291018i1e76383bn689dc351fdf018d@mail.gmail.com> (Niko Sams's message of "Mon\, 29 Jun 2009 19\:18\:14 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Niko" == Niko Sams writes: Tom> No, we have not implemented inferior function calls on Value yet. Niko> ok, at least this means it should be possible... Niko> Is this planned for 7.0? I don't have any concrete plan to implement it. I don't know whether anybody else is working on it at the moment. Tom