From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17521 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2011 17:43:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 17513 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2011 17:43:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:42:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5DHgsh0023494 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:42:54 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5DHgsZK021612; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:42:54 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p5DHgrPe026885; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:42:53 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0833C378232; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:42:52 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Sterling Augustine Cc: Eli Zaretskii , niko.sams@gmail.com, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: watchpoint on variable in function scope References: <838vtkf7lx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sterling Augustine's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:43:05 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sterling" == Sterling Augustine writes: Sterling> Tom's test case works fine for me if I compile it as a C program. Sterling> However, it fails if I compile it as a C++ program. (Using gcc 4.4.3.) Sterling> Looking at the assembly, the C code names the static "i.1591", but the Sterling> C++ code uses "_ZZ3foovE1i". Sterling> So this seems to be a C++ name look up failure. Not sure it Sterling> how should work. Could you file this in bugzilla? Tom