From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23602 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2011 11:17:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 23509 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Sep 2011 11:17:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:16:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8FBGmQg001824 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:16:48 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8FBGlI5032615; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:16:47 -0400 From: Phil Muldoon To: Cc: Subject: Re: Python: gdb.Type.template_argument method issue References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0307EF93D7@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> Reply-to: pmuldoon@redhat.com X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0307EF93D7@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> (Paul Koning's message of "Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:33:37 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 writes: > The template_argument method assumes that all template arguments are type= s.=C2=A0 While that's the most common, other things are also found in the w= ild.=C2=A0 My C++ book says that the arguments can be integers, enums, poin= ters, references, or pointer-to-member constant values.=C2=A0 (GCC doesn't = want to accept pointers and references, perhaps because it thinks they are = relocatable.) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11060 > Any hints on where to look? If that is the issue you are encountering, it looks like it has been fixed in GDB, but you need a newer GCC to take advantage of it. Cheers Phil